I need someone to help me fix and add more to my essay. Here is the prompt: “In 1000-1500 words, Socrates and the Pursuit of Wisdom Essay Prompt: Philosophy is a pursuit of wisdom, exemplified in the figure of Socrates. In a paper united by a thesis and organizational statements that appear early (i.e. in the first paragraph), explain what Socrates meant by wisdom. Briefly describe Socrates’ method for pursuing wisdom and, summarizing some of the main points you have gathered from the readings, explain how Socrates’ pursuit relates to a meaningful life. “I need someone to help me fix and add more to my essay. Here is the prompt: “In 1000-1500 words, Socrates and the Pursuit of Wisdom Essay Prompt: Philosophy is a pursuit of wisdom, exemplified in the figure of Socrates. In a paper united by a thesis and organizational statements that appear early (i.e. in the first paragraph), explain what Socrates meant by wisdom. Briefly describe Socrates’ method for pursuing wisdom and, summarizing some of the main points you have gathered from the readings, explain how Socrates’ pursuit relates to a meaningful life. ”
Meaning of Wisdom according to Socrates
Socrates was an established philosopher of the ancient Greece who is viewed as one of the organizers of present day logic. In spite of the fact that there are no writings straightforwardly composed by Socrates, we are aware of his thoughts from the works of his understudies Plato and Xenophon. As per Socrates, wisdom is identified with one’s close insight about someone’s degree of learning. Sometimes you may think you are insightful and stretch out that discernment to a misrepresentation of being astute about a wide scope of subjects, at that point you are not so much wise. The sign of a genuinely wise individual is that the person acknowledges his or her own absence of learning decisively.
The wisdom is being defined by the Socratic traits in Plato’s “Apology”. Socrates depicts how his devotee Chaerephon ventured to the oracles and Delphi and put to it the topic of who was the smartest. The oracle addressed that none was wiser than Socrates. Socrates illustrates this reaction I Apology with a contention known as “Socratic obliviousness”. Socrates guarantees that he was at first confounded by the oracle’s case since he did not think about himself insightful. He accepted it as a sacred obligation to speak to those who were said to be insightful in Athens to study the oracle’s case. What he found is that many individuals who were viewed as wise were not, on the grounds that they just knew models and wonders as opposed to forces and structures (Rayner). In the end Socrates understood that the general population who seemed to be insightful was in fact not so, but rather they were bamboozled seeing that they were uninformed of their own numbness. Since Socrates knew his own obliviousness, he was wiser than all others in just that single thing, acknowledging the limit of his wisdom (Lodhi).
Socrates’ method for pursuing wisdom
Socrates was on a very basic level concerned about the commonsense issue of helping individuals build up the thinking capacities imperative to living a balanced life. Socratic Method is an approach to look for certainties by your own lights. A Socratic exchange uncovers how unique our viewpoints can be on ideas we utilize each day. It uncovers how extraordinary our methods of insight are, and regularly how viable or indefensible, as the case scope rationalities can be.
The Socratic Method extends through so many stages. Dialogue normally doesn’t proceed in a straight way through these stages on the grounds that new knowledge picked up amid the procedure regularly requires the adventurers to reapply the procedure, starting at a prior stage with a more noteworthy clearness and comprehension. The stages are: Ponder—the procedure starts when interest and our drive for scholarly investigation drives normally to making inquiries. From ponder a theory emerges (Boghossian). The second stage is theory which is the theoretical reaction to the inquiry emerging from our wonder forms the speculation (Boghossian).
The third stage is elenchus. This is the focal strategy of the technique. Elenchus is a type of agreeable factious discourse between people, in view of asking and noting inquiries to invigorate basic reasoning and to draw out thoughts and hidden assumptions. It is a “contention of negation; questioning, testing, investigation particularly for reasons for refutation.” As initially polished by Socrates, it has the accompanying steps:
Socrates’ questioner affirms a proposition, for instance “Strength is perseverance of the spirit”, which Socrates thinks about false and focuses for negation. Also, Socrates anchors his conversationalist consent to additionally premises, for instance “Mettle is a fine thing” and “Insensible continuance is certifiably not a fine thing”. Regularly counterexamples are utilized to test the speculation and exhibit why it isn’t right.
Socrates at that point contends, and the questioner concurs that these further premises suggest the opposite of the first proposal; for this situation, it prompts: “bravery isn’t continuance of the spirit”. Socrates at that point guarantees that he has demonstrated that his conversationalist postulation is false and that its invalidation is valid.
Tolerating or Revising the Hypothesis—if the speculation has withstood examination in the elenchus stage, at that point the theory stands and the following stage can start. Something else, a reconsidered speculation is proposed to fuse what was found out above, and the elenchus starts with this new theory. Acting in like manner—the members presently apply what has been realized. This may involve overhauling a recently held conviction, pondering the session, pondering about something recently, consenting to meet once more, or evolving conduct. The key assignments requiring the most aptitude and practical insight are: picking the conversationalist, picking the principal question, picking the following inquiry, and choosing when to stop.
Application of Socratic Method
Learning: Individual may wish to watch, partake, or lead session utilizing the Socratic Method as an approach to become familiar with the technique to get familiar with the point being analyzed, or to appreciate all the more captivating communications with other individuals (Whipple).
Challenging beliefs: since the Socratic Method challenges presumptions, convictions and vague reasoning apparent from the underlying speculation, it ends to be utilized to test unwarranted convictions and may prompt new bits of knowledge or may make somebody change their long held, yet ineffectively analyzed beliefs. The Socratic Method can be valuable system in numerous types of psychotherapy where it is utilized to enable an individual to change and beat issues in wanted ways (Labendz).
Education: Socrates believed that the Socratic Method was the main substantial way to learning. We saw in Meno how the Method evoked inert information from the slave. The Method has incredible potential as an educating instrument. The Socratic Method is a useful asset to rouse understudies to take a profound enthusiasm for their very own excitedly adamant training and flourishing in life (Whipple).
Boghossian, Peter. A manual creating atheists. Pitchstone Publishing, 2013.
Labendz, Jenny R. Socratic Torah: Non-Jews in Rabbinic Intellectual Cultur. OUP, USA, 2013.
Lodhi, Anam. Socrates on Wisdom. 2018. 22 January 2019.
Rayner, Tim. What is Wisdom? Socrates and the known Unknowns. 21 Nov 2015. 22 January 2019.
Whipple, Robert D. Socratic Method and Writing Instruction. University Press of America, 1997.